Our Blog RSS

Author Archive

Solar Power – A Simple Overview

The Sun radiates 89 PetaWatts amount of energy at the Earth 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It is enough to cover the total energy usage of the Earth 6000 times over. The key to endless energy is all around us in the form of sunlight, ripe for the taking. The ability to feasibly harness this energy would surely be the Holy Grail of all energy sources.

The Sun is of course responsible for almost all forms of energy on the earth. Wind and wave power are both driven by heating from the Sun. Fossil fuels contain energy from plants & animals that have soaked up juice from Solar rays. The same goes for Biofuels. About the only energy sources that aren’t derived from the Sun are nuclear, which harnesses atomic energy, and tidal, which harnesses the gravitational energy from the Moon.

Solar power, converting energy from sunlight directly into electricity, comes in two main forms: PhotoVoltaic & Concentrating Solar Power. I’ll explain the difference and talk through some of the considerations that need to be made when choosing one over the other.

concentrating-solarConcentrating solar power uses arrays of mirrors to direct sunlight onto a very specific target in order to heat it up to very high temperatures. This is then used as a heat source for a conventional power station (whereby steam drives a turbine which generates electricity). It’s a very simple concept that has been around for more than a century. However, it is far from a simple technology. It requires detailed design to produce a system that is efficient as possible and the manufacture of the huge curved mirrors is quite an engineering feat.

photovoltaicPhotoVoltaic, on the other hand, uses a flat film of semi-conducting material. This has a special property whereby light shining on it will induce an electrical current, which can then be channelled off into the electricity grid.  This method directly transforms the incoming sunlight into electricity although, as always, there is a loss.

Every solar power station varies, but in general the most efficient large scale power stations are built using Concentrating Solar arrays.  It usually pips PhotoVoltaic cells in terms of energy efficiency for large arrays.  However, Concentrating Solar can’t be deployed on a small scale – you need a conventional turbine driven power station that is driven by the solar heat.  On the other hand the effectiveness of PhotoVoltaic solar energy is much more independent of size.  You can have a 1m x 1m PhotoVoltaic panel and it will work in the same way as a 100m x 100m array.  For this reason any small scale solar installation, such as those people often put on their roofs, are almost always PhotoVoltaic solar panels.

Hugely important in the development of solar energy is dealing with the irregularity of sunlight.  At night time or when the sun is hidden behind clouds, the amount of solar energy available is vastly reduced.  Therefore the ability to store the produced energy efficiently is extremely important.  Small scale arrays often work by ‘Net Metering‘, or ‘Feed-In Tariffs‘ as they are known in Europe.  The way it works is that the solar panels on your roof are connected to the energy grid. When there is excess energy to your requirements it will feed the grid and at night, when there is no solar energy, you can draw electricity back from the grid.  You get paid for the energy that you supply to the grid and, depending on local legislation, its usually at a very favourable rate to encourage the uptake of solar energy.

There are various other types of solar power that are also important:

solar-water-heaterSolar Water Heaters are perhaps the simplest of all types of solar energy.  The idea is simply to place a water tank/pipes in view of sunlight, usually on the roof, and then use this water for various heating functions in your house like showers and filling radiators.  The most common user of Solar Water heating is Israel where it is estimated that they save over two million barrels of oil a year.

solar-chimenyAnother type of solar power is Solar Chimneys, where in effect you have a very large, thin greenhouse with a chimney in the middle.  The air inside the greenhouse is heated by sunlight causing it to travel up the chimney (hot air rises, remember?).  The hot air will drive a turbine in the chimney, or something similar, which can be used to generate an electrical current.

Update: Interested in Solar Panels? Check out our Win a Solar Panel Competition

Belu – Carbon Neutral and Biodegradable Bottled Water

belu-logo I have recently been hearing a lot of news about UK Company Belu, who have developed a fully biodegradable bottle for water.  The raw material for the bottles is corn, after undergoing a fermentation and distillation process.  The end result is a bottle that is effectively grown, that feels and looks just like the regular plastic water bottles that line our supermarket chains, convenience stores and, of course, our garbage dumps.

Belu also made the production of the bottles carbon neutral in 2006 and even donates the profits to projects that deliver clean water to parts of the world that lack access to it.  As a non profit organisation with such impeccable green credentials, it has seen some very strong growth in its sales.  From a base of $13,000 in 2006, its launch year, it just came off the back of a $4 million year in 2008.

The corn used to make the bottles can be grown in 100 days.  It can be broken down by commercial composting methods in 12 weeks, and by home composting in about a year.  Therefore, there is the potential to grow the corn, make the bottles and return them to raw bio mass to the soil in under 200 days, a pretty awesome example of nature in action.  Nothing created or destroyed, but a massive and rapid form transformation.

A selection of Belu biodegradable bottles

A selection of Belu biodegradable bottles

The US alone uses 1.5 million barrels of oil each year to make water bottles from polyethylene terephthalate.  The vast majority of which are landfilled or incinerated.  It would be great if we could simply shake our bottled water habit, but there are situations where a bottle is required so Belu’s bottles are an important innovation.  Furthermore, donating all profits to water projects such as WaterAid is truly a noble action.  It’s yet another example of the growing trend of social enterprises that shun monetary profit in aid of a greater social purpose.  We wish them the best of luck.

Google PowerMeter – Tracking your energy usage.

Google Powermeter is a new software tool that has been developed to help people track and analyze their home energy usage. The tool will provide a graphical interface that shows, in real time, how much electricity your house is pulling in from the grid. The pictures Google have made public indicate that the software will help you identify how much of your total energy usage is being made by each individual component in your house. Using energy intensive utilities like dish washers and kettles will provide a characteristic spike in your electricity usage so you will be able to identify the electrical footprint of all the utilities in your house. Knowing Google, there will be a few unexpected extras thrown in there as well. It’s currently still in beta but it is slowly starting to become available to more and more people.

google-powermeter-graph

Example of Google Powermeter

So why is energy usage monitoring important? Studies have shown that the mere act of measuring energy will actually cause energy usage to drop by an average of 5-15%. This is presumably because many energy saving actions will become very obvious. If you can see in a simple visual format the effect of running a dish washer or dryer you will immediately realize its a good idea to only run them only when they are full.

Why is Google getting involved in this? Google understands that when it comes to the environment the stakes are high and has always set a good example of corporate social responsibility. If each household in America used PowerMeter and got a 10% saving in energy usage because of it that would be the equivalent of taking more than 17 million cars off the road. Not bad for a simple software tool that is relatively inexpensive and simple to implement. The savings for consumers are also huge. One Google engineer in the video below claims to have dropped his bill by 64% and saved almost $3,000 already.

This is exactly the philosophy behind the project. In order to change something you need to be able to measure it. Google is going to arm you with the information you need to understand your energy usage, therefore enabling you to make the most effective changes to reduce it. Google will provide many tips on what you can do to save energy (and money) and the collaboration between users will be very exciting: sharing energy saving actions; calculating how effective each action is based on feedback from many people’s PowerMeter results; detailed aggregate data of energy usage; are just a few ideas that come to mind.

At the moment Google is forging partnerships with utility companies to bring the service to the public. If you use any of these providers, then you should be able to test out PowerMeter right away. In the US the partners are JEA in Florida, TXU Energy in Texas and San Diego Gas & Electric. We are considering switching our provider in our California office to San Diego Gas & Electric in order to take advantage of this. This google map of utility providers that use ’smart grid’ technology is likely to be a good indication of the utility companies that will adopt PowerMeter in the future, as such technology is required to make it work.

Miles Per Dollar – A new Metric For Fuel Economy

gwiz-chargeThe advent of plug in vehicles, whether hybrids or fully electric, signal the end for conventional miles per gallon ratings. The electrical energy in the battery needs to be taken into account and therefore some kind of conversion between electrical energy and gallons needs to be made. Do you calculate the amount of energy stored in the gas and the battery and compare? But what about the energy that went into producing the electricity, which is a highly organized form of energy, do you include that? If so, what about the energy that went into refining the gas and transporting it? Such a calculation becomes so complicated and opinionated that ultimately it comes down to what the NY Times describe as ‘fudge factors’.

This is just an off hand idea, but what about a simple miles per $ measurement to compare plug in hybrids? You calculate how much it costs to fill the tank and charge the battery – perhaps using national averages for gas/electricity prices – then drive it until all the juice is gone and see how far you get.

Now, I know this is flawed. Gas/Electricity prices fluctuate for one, nor can you derive what ratio of gas to electricity a car uses based on a miles per $ figure, but there’s no methodology that doesn’t have problems. Also traditional mpg figures are always quite different to real world usage, the important thing is just that they are standardized so you can compare different vehicles directly. So as long as you use the same prices to calculate MP$ figures for different cars, you will have a fair comparison.

Without dwelling on the flaws, let me point out two simple benefits: Firstly and most importantly, there is no opinion in the calculation and there can be no gaming. It is entirely objective. As the NYT says in their article, the current ways to calculate miles per gallon-equivalent (MPGe) are ‘no longer a strictly scientific measurement, but takes into account compensating factors’. This subjectivity is always going to be problematic as you will never be able to satisfy all the different manufacturers, environmental groups & scientists with the compensating factors that you choose and you run the risk that companies with most influence will get factors and comparisons most suited to their vehicles. With a measure of miles per $, there is no scope for this kind of wrangling and opinion.

Secondly, it caters to the average car buyer’s main concern: price. Consumers will get a much better idea of which cars will offer the lowest running costs. Conveniently, lower running costs are highly correlated with fuel economy, so although consumers might simply be trying to save money the end result will be a reduction in their carbon footprint. You could even speculate that because consumers react more strongly to price than any other concern, a MP$ metric might actually induce even more people to purchase vehicles with greater fuel economy than if they were doing it simply for the green benefits.

As I said previously, this is just an idea that I accept is not perfect and I welcome any feedback in the comments. In a world where corporate transparency is very blurred and traditional mpg estimates seem so far from the real world performance of vehicles, I believe that MP$ could prove a more accurate, honest and relevant statistic for consumers. The EPA is working on a methodology for MPGe as we speak, and from what I understand they are not considering anything like this, rather there will be some kind of system that converts the electrical energy into an amount of traditional petroleum gallons.

REVA Announces The Launch Of Two New Electric Vehicles

REVA-NXR

Reva Electric Car Company, manufacturers of the most highest selling electric vehicle to date, will next week be announcing two new models to their range of electric vehicles at the Frankfurt International Motor Show. The REVA NXR, pictured above, is a four-seat, three-door hatchback family car suitable for that is suited to urban driving. The REVA NXG will be a sporty two-seater with a targa roof.

Its great to see REVA innovating and producing new electric vehicle technology. Its clear that they have taken on board some of the criticisms of their current offering, the G-Whiz. For example the new NXR model looks a lot sturdier than the G-Whiz, which failed various safety tests and had to be labelled as a ‘quadracycle’ in the UK in order to circumvent safety regulations. Another criticism was the limited range, which REVA have responded to with the announcement of their new remote recharging technology, REVive, although the details of how this works are still unclear.

To date, REVA have managed to combine good technology with a low price which has led to great success with the G-Whiz. Its been quite a hit in European cities where its compact size helps it fit in and is now a common sight in places like London where it now enjoys on-street charging posts. This strong technology and low price has led to REVA putting 3,000 EVs on the road and gaining more than 70 million kilometres of user experience.

The company is building a new factory in Bangalore with a capacity of 30,000 per annum to cope with its increasing demand, which sure is a great sign for the EV industry as a whole.

If a driver of one these new vehicles should run out of juice on the road they can make one call or SMS to REVA and they will implement the REVive technology, which is said to provide an instant remote power boost. Wireless charging has been a fierce area of research for a long time and unless REVA have really developed some kind of revolutionary technology, we think this must work by activating some kind of backup battery in the car that is only accessible by themselves.

Forbes magazine announces ExxonMobil as its Green Company of the Year

exxonmobil-logoYes you read that correctly.

The hideously large oil munching, coal smoking, petroleum burning behemoth that is ExxonMobil has snapped the Green Company of the Year award, ahead of that charming new solar power startup that just opened up in your town. Apparently, being one of the world’s largest emitters of carbon dioxide gas doesn’t exclude you from being green, according to Forbes. And its not for the $600 million investment recently spent on algae powered biofuels, its actually for a $30 billion project in Qatar, to build the world’s largest natural gas field.

OK, astonishment aside, there is logic here. Using natural gas to produce energy releases around half of the emissions compared to burning coal. Coal is without a doubt a dirty fuel, and using natural gas is a far better alternative. ExxonMobil argues that using the natural gas from its Qatar project in place of coal will release 70 million fewer tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This is undoubtedly the right thing to do – America needs energy and there are currently no alternatives to fossil fuels ready for large scale deployment – so lets use the less polluting fossil fuel. But one has to surprised with the prize Forbes has bestowed upon them. Its readily apparent that this is a business decision as Forbes points out it is “inspired more by the difficulty of finding petroleum than by any love for the environment”. Also, natural gas is currently more expensive than coal but with any kind of carbon tax on emissions it will become more competitive and possibly cheaper. Greater supply of natural gas that will come online in the coming years is also expected to make natural gass even more affordable.

Transitioning America to natural gas instead of coal is an important step. Its one of the cheapest ways to significantly reduce carbon emissions without making many sacrifices, in contrast with transitioning to electric vehicles, for example. However, its still jumping from one non renewable source to another. What we really need from one of the world’s biggest energy producers is serious research into renewable technologies. The biofuel investment mentioned above is just a fraction of the amount they are spending on natural gas. Perhaps next time Forbes will give recognition to a company that is actually working on a sustainable energy source.

Read the Forbes article here

Charge your Electric Car in London

As the UK based member of the PlentyWays team, I yesterday found myself face to face with a REVA G-Whiz electric car charging on the side of the street in central London. I thought it was a fascinating sight as its quite simply a glimpse of the future. Electric vehicles are going to be hugely necessary in the battle to reduce carbon emissions and being able to charge electric vehicles whilst you are out and about is going to be very important for the growth and adoption of this industry. Battery technology for electric vehicles is not yet developed enough to allow driving limitlessly so pulling over for a quick charge, much in the same way drivers need to fill up with gas currently, could be a common occurence in the (not so distant) future.

To use the scheme you need to register your vehicle first and you will receive an id card. You flash your card on the meter, plug the power chord into your car and thats it. You can charge for up to 2 hours, and power is provided by EDF who partially use renewable sources for their electricity generation making you just that little bit greener.

gwiz-charge

(more…)

Win a Solar Panel Competition

solar-panel

We are giving away a free Sunforce Solar Panel to anyone who retweets this page.  The Panel has an output of 1.8 Watts and can be used to top up your car battery.  Simply plug it into the 12V cigarette lighter plug in your vehicle and it will immediately start charging your car battery.

For a chance to win all you have to do is retweet this article, or send out a tweet that contains “@PlentyWays” and a link to this page (http://bit.ly/deASR) or any other page on our website.

For those of you who aren’t on Twitter (!) you can also write a blog post and link to us.  Let us know by sending us a message. No more entries after midnight next Friday 7th August.

Top Ten Electric Vehicles on the market

Electric cars are a very promising technology in reducing the carbon footprint of transport.  Although we are likely to see much innovation in this field in the future, many people do not realize that the technology to produce cars that run on electricity is already here.  Electric cars in general produce far less emissions than the best fossil fuel cars on the market.  Furthermore, if your electricity supplier uses renewable energy sources, the emissions of your electric car will effectively be zero.  So with out further ado, lets take a look at the top electric vehicles which are available now, or will very shortly be in production.

REVA G-Whiz i

REVA G-WhizThe REVA G-Whiz is currently the most popular batter powered electric car in the world.  Manufactured in India, the REVA is a smart 3-door city car that will fit two adults in the front and two children in the back.  A full charge will take around 6 hours and will cost less than $1.50 meaning running costs are an astounding 2c per mile.  The newest version includes higher performing Lithium Ion batteries that extend the range to 75 miles.

  • Range: Up to 75 miles
  • Max Speed: 50 mph
  • Approx: $13,000

Th!nk City

th!nk cityThe Th!nk City is another 3-Door Electric vehicle running on sodium or lithium batteries.  A product of Norwegian firm Th!nk, the City car is available in Norway and European markets with plans to come to the US soon.  It is one of only two crash tested and highway certified fully electric vehicles.  (The Tesla Roadster is the other).  The car is designed so that it can be recycled after it has been decommissioned helping to further reduce its environmental impact.

  • Range: Up to 110 miles
  • Max Speed: 62 mph
  • Price: NOR 212,500 (US $34,000), but US target price is $10-15,000

Smart ED

smart-edAvailable next year, the Smart ED is the first all electric vehicle from SMART, manufacturers of the pocket sized city cars that are ever more popular in Europe, and – believe me – they look even smaller in real life.  The ED follows much the same design as other Smart vehicles, but behind the fuel cap is actually a standard mains plug.  The Smart ED can fit only 2 passengers and will take around 8 hours to charge the batteries to capacity.

  • Range: Up to 68 miles
  • Max Speed: 74 mph
  • Price: Approx < $20,000

Tesla Roadster

tesla roadsterThe Tesla Roadster is without doubt the cream of the crop of electric vehicles. With a stunning design and performance to rival some of the best fossil fuel powered sports cars, the Roadster is truly a break through vehicle that demonstrates that you don’t have to make cutbacks on quality if you want to go electric. It combines a 0-60 mph time of 3.7 seconds, with an efficiency that is up their with the best electric vehicles – achieving a breathtaking 120 miles per gallon equivalent (mpgge). The only drawback would be the over $100k price tag, however the Silicon Valley company behind the Roadster is planning a more accessible sedan version known as the ‘Model S’, which will cut the price in half.

  • Range: 244 miles
  • Max Speed: 125 mph (electronically limited)
  • Price: $109,000

Toyota Prius (Hybrid)

priusWhilst not technically a fully electric vehicle, the Toyota Prius with its hybrid engine deserves a mention here.  The greenest vehicle by the world’s largest automaker is an important milestone and a very advanced specimen of technology.  The hybrid engine means the car will run on fuel but will also use advanced techniques such as regenerative breaking (which captures a vehicles kinetic energy whilst breaking) to charge an onboard battery.  When the battery has sufficient power stored up, the engine can switch to EV mode, whereby it is propelled purely by electrical energy.  This hybrid engine results in 54.7 mpg rating, although the 3rd generation models will bring this up to 60.3 mpg.  Its no surprise to learn that worldwide sales of the Prius reached 1.2 million in early 2009.

  • Range: ~ 600 miles (Petrol)
  • Max Speed: 112 mph
  • Price: $21,000

Lightening GT

lightningThe Lightening GT is in a similar mould to the Tesla Roadster. The British made Lightening features a sleek design and a 0-60 mph time of under 4 seconds. A killer feature is its fast charging lithium-titanate battery which, given the right high capacity power source, can charge in 10 minutes. On standard mains power this would be more like overnight. The lightning GT is a 2 seat convertible and is available to order now for 2009/2010 delivery in the UK and is set to reach the US market ’soon’.

  • Range: 188 miles
  • Max Speed: 130 mph (electronically limited)
  • Price: £120,000 / ~$200,000

Mitsubishi iMIEV

imievThe iMIEV from Mitsubishi Motors Company is due to start production in 2010. It can fit four full sized adults but has a greater efficiency than the G-Whiz, getting around 100 miles from 16 KWh and has an impressive top speed of around 80 mph.

NICE Mega City

nice-mega-cityThe Mega City available from NICE (No Internal Combustion Engine) is a french made 2-seater city car.  NICE also have a large truck version, the “Mega Mutitruck” and a pickup style version, the “Mega Worker”.

  • Range: 60 miles
  • Max Speed: 40mph
  • Price: ~$20,000

Vectrix Scooter

vectrixThe Vectrix was the first high powered electric scooter available on the market. Its great design and 0-50 mph in 7 seconds made it very desirable. The company unfortunately went in to liquidation earlier this month and won’t be able to continue existing in its current form. However, Vextrix scooters are still readily available second hand and the technology could be given further life if a suitable company swoops in to buy the remaining assets.

  • Range: 65 miles
  • Max Speed: 60 mph
  • Price: ~$9,000

Oxygen Cargo Scooter

cargo-scooterThe Cargo Scooter is a Dutch Made Electric Scooter that has been picked up by Domino’s Pizza to equip their fleet of delivery vehicles.  Taking only 2-3 hours to charge, it is adept for traversing short distances quickly, cheaply and environmentally.  It is available now in both European and North American markets.

  • Range: 50 miles
  • Max Speed: 28 mph

Clearly there are very good options for fully electric vehicles on the market right now and even more in the near future.  It is exciting to think that the technology is still in its infancy and there are further gains and innovations to be had.  There are many advantages to driving electric cars over their combustion engine equivalents.  No more trips down to the pumps, electric cars all work off standard mains electricity that we have at home.  No more remembering to check the oil level in the engine, electric cars don’t require the stuff.  No more shouting over the sound of the engine, electrical engines are near silent.  Some even worry that this may be a safety hazard as people can’t hear the cars coming down the road.  It would be trivial however to add an artificial sound and it would surely be engineered to remain as quiet as possible to those within the vehicle.  Also bear in mind the running cost of an electric vehicle is far less than a petrol/diesel powered vehicle.  Take a look at the following calculation for a demonstration.  Note that it does not include various subsidies and reliefs that you can get for driving an environmentally friendly vehicle, which are only likely to increase further in the future.

The average American vehicle does 20 miles per gallon.  At $2.80 a gallon, this is around $0.14 per mile.  As noted above, the G-Whiz costs around $0.02 per mile.  The average American drives around 12,000 miles per year, which will cost $1,680 in your gas guzzler, or around $240 in your G-Whiz, giving a massive saving of $1,440 a year.  The car will pay for itself in no time.

Now imagine a more extreme case: You drive a gas guzzler that manages 13 mpg, fuel hits $4 a gallon again and you drive an amount towards the upper limit of the US Average (say 15,000 miles per year).  In this scenario your car costs around $4,615 a year to run, compared with the same $240 for your G-Whiz!  A truly amazing difference.

Update: Just stumbled across ZapWorld as well, who seem to do a range of electric vehicles. If anyone has any knowledge of them let us know in the comments.

Quotes on Energy, the Environment and planet Earth

  • We never know the worth of water till the well is dry.  ~Thomas Fuller, Gnomologia, 1732
  • Don’t blow it – good planets are hard to find.  ~Quoted in Time
  • When a man throws an empty cigarette package from an automobile, he is liable to a fine of $50.  When a man throws a billboard across a view, he is richly rewarded.  ~Pat Brown, quoted in David Ogilvy, Ogilvy on Advertising, 1985
  • The word “wilderness” occurs approximately three hundred times in the Bible, and all its meanings are derogatory.  ~René Dubos, The Wooing of Earth, 1980

**I will be updating this post as I come across more quotes…**  is64qyg8ce

is64qyg8ce