Archive for August, 2009

A day in the life…of my electricity

Here we have an annotated graph of a typical day in my house. Using data like this is a really useful way to keep track of what energy you are using, and pinpointing where you can make savings.

For example we can see the dishwasher usage at (J) and (K). The standard cycle on my dishwasher has a ‘heated dry’ part at the end. I never realized before just how much energy it uses. Having the heated dry on basically doubles the dishwasher energy consumption. From now on I think I’ll run the dishwasher before I go to bed, and leave off the heated dry.
Tip: Don’t use heated dry on the dishwasher.

The ‘resting’ electricity in my house seems to oscillate between 80 and 115 Watts. I think the change might be the fridge coming on every 90 minutes. Here is a list of what is on 24/7 in my house:

  • The fridge
  • Alarm system
  • Clocks on the cooker/coffee machine/boiler
  • Cable modem and router
  • CurrentCost and the laptop that’s currently uploading the data.

Of these the laptop is the only saving I can really make – it’s being replaced by a low energy alternative (more on that later this week).
Even without the CurrentCost/laptop the house seems to be drawing around 80 Watts, which seems like a lot. Anyone know how much their house uses so I can compare?
Tip: Before bed go around your house and switch off everything that you can.

The kettle draws a lot of power but for a short period. You can really see the difference between boiling a single cup (H) and enough for a saucepan (G).
Tip: Only boil the water you need.

As you can see from (I) there was 1.5 hours in the evening when I left on the kitchen lights. The lights in the kitchen are 6 halogen spot bulbs, and boy do they suck up the juice – 240W in total! If I did that every day I would be emitting 180 lbs of CO2 into the atmosphere (0.24 kW * 1.5 hr/day * 365 days * 1.37 lbs per kWh).
Naughty!
Tip: Make sure you switch of lights when not in use, especially halogen/incandescent bulbs. Replace them with energy efficient bulbs when they die.

So apart from the power hungry kitchen lights nothing too surprising here. However, seeing the energy in graph form like this really shows where you can make savings, and I’m already changing my habits.

Forbes magazine announces ExxonMobil as its Green Company of the Year

exxonmobil-logoYes you read that correctly.

The hideously large oil munching, coal smoking, petroleum burning behemoth that is ExxonMobil has snapped the Green Company of the Year award, ahead of that charming new solar power startup that just opened up in your town. Apparently, being one of the world’s largest emitters of carbon dioxide gas doesn’t exclude you from being green, according to Forbes. And its not for the $600 million investment recently spent on algae powered biofuels, its actually for a $30 billion project in Qatar, to build the world’s largest natural gas field.

OK, astonishment aside, there is logic here. Using natural gas to produce energy releases around half of the emissions compared to burning coal. Coal is without a doubt a dirty fuel, and using natural gas is a far better alternative. ExxonMobil argues that using the natural gas from its Qatar project in place of coal will release 70 million fewer tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This is undoubtedly the right thing to do – America needs energy and there are currently no alternatives to fossil fuels ready for large scale deployment – so lets use the less polluting fossil fuel. But one has to surprised with the prize Forbes has bestowed upon them. Its readily apparent that this is a business decision as Forbes points out it is “inspired more by the difficulty of finding petroleum than by any love for the environment”. Also, natural gas is currently more expensive than coal but with any kind of carbon tax on emissions it will become more competitive and possibly cheaper. Greater supply of natural gas that will come online in the coming years is also expected to make natural gass even more affordable.

Transitioning America to natural gas instead of coal is an important step. Its one of the cheapest ways to significantly reduce carbon emissions without making many sacrifices, in contrast with transitioning to electric vehicles, for example. However, its still jumping from one non renewable source to another. What we really need from one of the world’s biggest energy producers is serious research into renewable technologies. The biofuel investment mentioned above is just a fraction of the amount they are spending on natural gas. Perhaps next time Forbes will give recognition to a company that is actually working on a sustainable energy source.

Read the Forbes article here

Charge your Electric Car in London

As the UK based member of the PlentyWays team, I yesterday found myself face to face with a REVA G-Whiz electric car charging on the side of the street in central London. I thought it was a fascinating sight as its quite simply a glimpse of the future. Electric vehicles are going to be hugely necessary in the battle to reduce carbon emissions and being able to charge electric vehicles whilst you are out and about is going to be very important for the growth and adoption of this industry. Battery technology for electric vehicles is not yet developed enough to allow driving limitlessly so pulling over for a quick charge, much in the same way drivers need to fill up with gas currently, could be a common occurence in the (not so distant) future.

To use the scheme you need to register your vehicle first and you will receive an id card. You flash your card on the meter, plug the power chord into your car and thats it. You can charge for up to 2 hours, and power is provided by EDF who partially use renewable sources for their electricity generation making you just that little bit greener.

gwiz-charge

(more…)